Judge Roy Moore’s removal upheld by seven-member court of review

Judge Roy Moore’s removal upheld by seven-member court of review

Judge Roy Moore, whose 5,300-pound Ten Commandments monument cost him his job as chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, had his removal from office upheld April 30 by a special court of review.

The seven-member court unanimously ruled that former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore’s removal from office last year was “proper” because he violated state ethics codes when he defied a federal court order to remove the monument.

Moore was removed from the bench last November by a state Court of the Judiciary. Alabama Gov. Bob Riley appointed seven retired judges to serve on the special court to hear Moore’s appeal of his removal.

“We conclude … that the sanction of removal from office was not plainly and palpably wrong, manifestly unjust or without supporting evidence,” the court ruled in its 35-page ruling. “In fact, the evidence of Chief Justice Moore’s violations of the Canons of Judicial Ethics was sufficiently strong and convincing that the Court of the Judiciary could hardly have done otherwise than to impose the penalty of removal from office.”

The decision appears to be Moore’s last avenue of appeal on the state level. But, still defiant, Moore held out the possibility of appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court, which last year refused to hear his case.

Moore rebuffed the judgment of the “illegally appointed, politically selected” court in a written statement.

“This is about the acknowledgment of God and many justices can’t admit they are wrong and that they can enter unlawful orders,” he said. “The rule of law is the written law and it is clear. The people of Alabama have a right to acknowledge God and no judge or group of judges has the right to take it away from them.”

In arguments held in February, Assistant Attorney General Charles Campbell argued that Moore “took the law into his own hands, and he broke it.” Moore’s lawyers argued he had the right to acknowledge God, as well as to disobey an order that he felt was unjust.

The court, in its decision, said the case was about judicial arrogance, not religious faith.

Moore was elected to the state’s highest court in 2000 after riding a wave of popular support for his crusades to display the Ten Commandments in Alabama courtrooms.

That support peaked in July 2001, when Moore placed the massive granite monument in the judicial building’s rotunda under the cover of darkness, and then refused to remove it. His support ebbed, however, when he defied a federal appeals court order to move the monument, which was removed by eight fellow justices to a storage room last August. (RNS)