Video gambling bans inconsistent across state; owners on the move

Video gambling bans inconsistent across state; owners on the move

Perhaps if William Shakespeare lived in Alabama today he could write an interesting soliloquy regarding the state’s ambiguous “Chuck E. Cheese” law that would sound something like:

“To allow video gambling devices to operate or not to allow them to operate — ah, that is the question.” And it’s one that proponents and opponents alike would like to have answered — now.

This seesaw question stems from the countless attempts to interpret the Chuck E. Cheese law, which states that video gambling devices are allowed to operate if skill, not chance, is a requirement to win. The law, which was passed in 1996, also mandates a $5 maximum noncash payout for prizes.

As district attorneys attempt to understand the ramifications of this law as it relates to adult arcades and video gambling, judges at all levels are facing court cases on the same matter. And law enforcement officials find themselves stumped as to what the law is, what it may be next week and what exactly they should do with the controversial businesses.

Macon County Sheriff David Warren said they “are stuck between a rock and a hard place.”

“We want to enforce the law, but this is just a political football game,” Warren said. “It’s unfair to law enforcement to try and enforce a law that’s legal on one side of the road and not on the other.”

Video gambling device owners and arcade proprietors across the state claim the only consistency in the ongoing controversy has been the mixed messages they receive from county to county, judge to judge and district attorney to district attorney.

“The only thing we can be sure of is that something will change next week or next month,” said Birmingham arcade proprietor, Dale Statton, who has opened and closed his establishment on three different occasions.

And with the fluctuation of decisions, arcade owners find themselves determining how flexible they want to be. Some have closed down and gotten out of the business while others travel from county to county and stay as long as the local law allows.

For instance, two female video arcade owners affected by the latest legality changes in Jefferson County were determined to find a new location for what they say is a lucrative business. The two women claimed to have grossed  $450,000 in just six months of operation in Jefferson County.

A mayor in a nearby county politely informed them they would have to continue their quest in another township as the local city council had voted to not allow business licenses to be sold to adult video arcades. However, finding a county in which to set up shop should not be too difficult with one-third of the counties in the state still permitting video gambling.

As of the end of June, 23 counties were allowing the gambling machines to operate while 42 had halted the activity. Jefferson County fell in a category all its own. Currently the areas of Jefferson County under jurisdiction of the Birmingham police department are deemed illegal areas for video gambling devices, but the areas under county law enforcement jurisdiction can operate.

Jefferson County Deputy Sheriff Dennis Blanton said Sheriff Jim Woodward closed and reopened arcades on three different occasions in Jefferson County. After continually being sued by arcade owners despite winning a high profile court case, Woodward finally made the decision to leave alone arcades that were operating within the law in his jurisdiction until the Supreme Court made a definitive ruling on the issue.

‘Mom and pop’ establishments

Many county district attorneys report that the majority of gaming devices in their districts are operated in “mom and pop” type of establishments but report that many of the machines are owned by out-of-state businessmen. Still other areas have full-blown adult arcades running around the clock seven days a week.

The most obvious county is Montgomery, where an estimated 100 arcades are in operation.

“They are located side by side on some streets,” Statton said, as to his reasoning for not relocating in Montgomery County. “There are just too many of them down there for me to be able to make a profit,” he explained.

In some counties, officials allowed the devices at first but have now reversed that decision. Enforcing that decision has not come easily, however.

For example, a letter from 5th Circuit District Attorney Rae Clarke went out to machine owners in his district, which encompasses Chambers, Macon, Randolph and Tallapoosa counties. They were given several months to stop their machines and remove them from the county with a June 30 deadline. Although there are not many adult arcades operating in the district, there are 300 gaming devices located at VictoryLand dog track in Macon County.

As of July 17 the machines were still operating, along with those located in a few small businesses. One law enforcement official said that one machine owner agreed to stop operating his machine when Milton McGregor, (the owner of VictoryLand) stopped operating his.

McGregor was contacted several times by phone and fax by The Alabama Baptist but he did not respond to either. Video gambling machines are also operated at GreeneTrack greyhound dog racing in Greene County.

During this year’s legislative session, Sen. Gerald Dial, D-Lineville, attempted to legalize video gambling at the state’s four dog tracks. While Dial’s bill failed, so did all bills for and against video gambling.

Several lawsuits also sit idle in courts across the state, including the Alabama Supreme Court. Even though four state Supreme Court justices issued an opinion declaring the “Chuck E. Cheese” law unconstitutional, no urgency resulted in the lower cases being moved along so they could be heard by the full state Supreme Court.

Attorney General Bill Pryor filed a lawsuit in Montgomery civil court last August challenging the constitutionality of the law. According to his office, there is a court date set for Aug. 28 certifying the defendants as a “class” so that the case will qualify as a class action suit.

But the word circulating among arcade owners is that their businesses are safe for a while longer.

“We’ve been told that the decision may not be made until all the new officials get put into office,” said an employee of M.T.’s Arcade in Center Point.